With a focus on learning materials, Phase One of the Reginald Phillips
Research Programme explored expectations concerning graphicacy at primary school level for
both sighted and visually impaired children, and went on to document the experiences of visually
impaired pupils and their teachers in using tactile graphics. It comprised three stages which are
outlined below. The work was successfully completed in December 2000.
Graphicacy at primary school level
At the outset of the research we wanted to establish what standard of
graphicacy is required of children at primary school, and to review the available guidance for
converting visual graphics to a tactile format for blind primary school children. The education and
research literature reveals little about what constitutes graphicacy amongst sighted primary school
children and virtually nothing about graphicacy for blind children that age. We therefore started from
first principles, reviewing science books used in mainstream primary schools, analysing the National
Curriculum as it bears on graphicacy, and examining the R.N.I.B.'s guidelines for translating public
examination papers. Two papers arose from this stage of our research.
In the first paper (Graphicacy: The fourth 'R'?) we look at graphicacy in the
sighted context, consider what primary school children need to know to understand the graphics they encounter,
argue that graphicacy is an important aspect of literacy, and offer teachers some practical suggestions for
making graphicacy explicit within the teaching agenda.
In the second paper (Tactile graphics: A beginner's
guide to graphics for visually impaired children) we offer a basic
introduction to the design and use of tactile graphics in the
classroom. The paper is particularly aimed at people who may be
called upon to provide support for a visually impaired child in
a classroom context for the first time. We outline the common
methods for producing tactile graphics, consider which graphics
are worth 'translating' into tactile form, offer some pointers
for making this translation, and suggest a procedure for supporting
a child in using tactile graphics.
See Our Publications
for the full text of these papers.
Challenges of tactile graphics from
the perspective of pupils
In the production of many products, collecting user
feedback has come to play an important part in the design cycle. As
far as we are aware, however, no-one has previously explored the attitudes
and experiences of visually impaired pupils regarding tactile graphics.
To explore the experiences and attitudes of pupils, we
devised a focus group format which allowed participants to raise issues they
considered important, rather than our pre-judging what those issues might be.
Using this focus group method we collected the views of 40 primary and secondary
pupils at special schools. Analysis of the focus group discussions identified a
number of issues regarding tactile graphics from the users' point of view, some
of which were unanticipated.
The results of the study are reported in our paper 'Tactile graphics
in school education: perspectives from pupils'. See Our Publications
for the abstract of this paper.
Challenges of tactile graphics from
the perspective of teachers
Teachers are in the unique position of selecting, designing, and using
tactile graphics in the context of lessons they have planned, and with children whose abilities
they know. In this they are unlike specialist producers who may have no teaching experience and
little contact with the pupils who use their graphics. However, reports in the literature are
generally from specialist producers of tactile graphics (who focus on issues of production rather
than use) or from academic researchers. It is rare to hear the views of teachers. We felt it was
important to find out about teachers' experiences with tactile graphics in the classroom, and to
document their principal concerns. Following a number of in-depth one-to-one interviews with teachers,
we devised a postal questionnaire designed to allow participants to raise the issues of greatest
concern to them personally. Using the questionnaire we collected the views of 24 teachers working
with visually impaired children in special and mainstream schools.
The results of the questionnaire study are reported in our paper
'Tactile graphics in school education: perspectives from teachers'. See Our Publications
for the abstract of this paper.