Research Methods II: Autumn Term 1998

Using SPSS: One-way Independent-Measures ANOVA:

In this handout, I will show you how to do the following:

(a) perform a one-way independent-measures ANOVA;

(b) obtain descriptive statistics for the data on which the statistics are performed;

(c) perform post-hoc tests to determine exactly which differences between groups are giving rise to the overall statistical significance shown by the ANOVA.

Step-by-step one-way independent-measures ANOVA:

1. Enter the data:

You need to arrange the data in the following way. One column contains the dependent variable, and another column contains code-numbers which tell SPSS which group the subject belongs to (i.e. the independent variable). Note that you can give your columns meaningful names by double clicking on the top of the column (double-click where the columns have already been given default names like "var00001").

A concrete example might make this clear. Imagine we are interested in age-differences in reaction-time. We have three groups: "young" people, "middle-aged" people and "old" people. Let's call the "young" people group "1"; the middle-aged people group "2"; and the "old" people group "3". Suppose we have six subjects in each group1".

Here's what our SPSS data-window might look like.

I have three columns, labelled "subject", "rt" and "age". (The "subject" column isn't necessary for the ANOVA, I've included it here in order to emphasise how each row represents one person's data. It's often useful to have such a column, especially if you have a lot of data for each subject, as it makes it easier to keep track of whose data is where in the data-window).

In the column of the SPSS data-window labelled "rt", I have entered the reaction-times for the subjects. In the column labelled "age", I've entered the number 1, 2 or 3, to designate which group the subject belongs to.

(Merely for the sake of clarity, it's best to enter all of the scores for one group, and then all of the scores for the next group, and so on, as shown here. However, there's nothing to stop you entering the scores all mixed up in the column, since SPSS will use the codes in the "age" column to sort out which scores belong to which group).

It is always a good idea to save data you have entered. To do this, put a floppy disk in a drive. Click on "File" and then "Save Data".

2. Perform the ANOVA:

There's more than one way to perform a one-way independent-measures ANOVA with SPSS. The method described here has the advantage of enabling you to get descriptive statistics for the groups (means, etc.) without having to ask for them separately. It also allows you to perform post-hoc tests on the data, to pinpoint the source of the significant differences shown by the ANOVA (assuming there are any!).

(a): Click on "Statistics", then "Compare Means", and then "One-way ANOVA":

(b) Highlight the dependent variable on which you want to perform the ANOVA. In this case, we've only got one to choose from: "rt", the column containing the reaction-time scores. Click on the upper arrow-button to move "rt" into the box entitled "dependent list". Basically, we have now told SPSS where our data, our scores, are located.

(c) We now need to tell SPSS about the independent variable in our experiment. Our independent variable is "age", and we have three levels of it - young (coded with a 1), middle-aged (coded with a 2) and old (coded with a 3). Highlight "age" and use the lower arrow-button to move it into the box labelled "factor". As soon as you do this, the "define range" button below the box will change from faded to bold, and question-marks will appear in the box, behind the word "age".

(d) Click on "define range": a dialog box will pop up, asking for a "minimum" and a "maximum". All SPSS wants to know is the lowest and highest numbers used as codes for your independent variable. In this case, our lowest code is "1" (for "young") and the highest is "3" (for "old"), so type these numbers into the respective boxes. Then click on "continue". This dialog box will disappear, leaving you with the previous one on the screen.

(e) We could now click on "OK", and we would get our ANOVA. However, we want descriptive statistics for each group, and we want post-hoc tests to see which of the three groups are significantly different from each other.

To get the descriptive statistics, click on "Options...". A dialog box will appear. Click on "Descriptive", to put a little tick in the box next to it; and then click on "Continue". You will then be returned to the previous dialog box.

To get the post-hoc tests, click on "Post Hoc..". A dialog box will appear, giving a whole range of different post-hoc tests - all different ways of making all possible comparisons between pairs of groups in your study. You can click on any of these to have SPSS work them out for you: at the moment, just click on "Student Newman-Keuls". A tick should appear next to it, to show that it has been selected. Click on "continue" to close the dialog box and return to the previous one.

(f) Now click on "OK", and SPSS will perform the calculations. The window will swap from the data-window to the output window, and you will see the results of the analyses

3. Testing the assumptions of ANOVA

ANOVA assumes that the population distribution for each of your groups is normal. To check this you should plot a histogram for the data in each group. On the SPSS controls at the top of the screen, click on "Statistics"; this will produce a menu. On this menu, click on "Summarize". Another menu will appear. On this one, click on "Explore". A dialog box will now appear. Enter your dependent variable in the dependent list and your independent variable in the factor list. Click on "Plots…" and click against "Histogram". Click on "Continue" and then "OK". You will be bale to see the histograms by clicking on "Window" and then "Chart Carousel". Use the up and down arrows to scroll through the charts.

Given a sample of say only 12 people in a group, you can’t expect the distribution to look very normal. In any case, ANOVA is reasonably robust to some violation of normality. What you are checking for is that the data are basically bunched together (not two separate groups, and also no outliers), reasonably symmetrically (not one tail much longer than the other). Particularly be on the lookout for outliers – an observation far removed from the main body of the data. These may be recording errors or they may be real, but they are disproportionately influential on the mean and standard deviation, and so should be removed from the analysis (just make sure you report that you have removed any data).

ANOVA also assumes that the variances are roughly equal in each group (the posh name for this assumption is "homogeneity of variance"). ANOVA is reasonably robust to violations of this assumption. If your largest variance is no more than five times your smallest then the assumption is satisfied adequately (assuming equal numbers of subjects in each group). The standard deviation for each group is given by the histogram; square the standard deviation to obtain the variance.

If either assumption is violated then you would normally need to do something about it (i.e. use Kruskal-Wallis). However, for the purposes of this module, you will use ANOVA anyway in order to learn the technique. But in your write-up you must indicate that you are aware of whether the assumptions were satisfied or not.

4. Interpreting the output:

The bits in normal type below are the output you would see; the bits in bold italics, enclosed within square brackets, are my explanations of what the output means.

- - - - - O N E W A Y - - - - -

[ This is called an ANOVA table. The Mean Square for Between Groups is often called "Mean Square Treatment", or MSt. The Mean Square for Within Groups is often called "Mean Square Error", or Mse. Note that each mean square is the relevant Sum of Squares divided by its degrees of freedom (D.F.). The F-ratio is MSt/Mse. F-prob. is the significance level for the F-ratio. SPSS only shows this to four digits - so the fact that it says .0000 here means that the F-ratio so highly significant that the p value is less than .00005 and hence too small to show, NOT that it is actually zero!]

Variable RT

By Variable AGE

Analysis of Variance

Source | D.F. |
Sum of Squares |
Mean Squares | F Ratio | F Prob. |

Between Groups | 2 | 288345.3333 | 144172.6667 | 26.6071 | .0000 |

Within Groups | 15 | 81278.6667 | 5418.5778 | ||

Total | 17 | 369624.0000 |

*
*

[Below are the descriptive statistics for the three groups in our experiment. The meaning of "count", "mean" and "standard deviation" should all be self-evident to you, and these are the important bits to concentrate on in the output below. "Standard error" and "95% confidence intervals for the mean" might puzzle you, although we have covered them in your first-year course.

Many procedures in SPSS provide estimates of "standard error". Imagine you had repeated your experiment an indefinite number of times, and calculated the mean each time; the standard error is an estimate of the standard deviation of that distribution of means. Basically, the larger it is compared to the mean, the more likely it is that taking different samples of subjects would produce different values for the mean. Remember that the sample mean is a kind of "spot-estimate" of the true mean of the population from which the sample was taken. In other words, if I did the experiment again, with different subjects, how likely would I be to get similar group means? If the standard error values are small, the answer is: quite likely to do so. If the standard error values are large, the answer would be: not very likely! So this gives you a rough-and-ready idea of how confident you can be about the values of the group means.

The 95% confidence intervals do a similar job in a way that may be easier to grasp intuitively. The 95% confidence interval is, informally speaking, the interval within which you can be 95% sure the true population mean lies. (More precisely, the interval is defined like this: If you repeated your experiment an indefinite number of times, the 95% confidence interval would contain the true population mean 95% of the time. But lets stick with the informal definition for now.) Take the mean for group 1: it's 397. This looks pretty precise! However, you know it is only a sample estimate, and the population mean may be a little big bigger or smaller. But how much bigger or smaller? Its likely to be close to the sample mean; its far less likely to be 20000, for example. In fact, we are 95% sure it is not bigger than 485, nor smaller than 308. But we can’t with any confidence rule out any of the numbers in between.

Simply looking at the means, we might think group 1 and group 2 are different from each other: however, looking at the confidence interval values makes us more aware of how much potential overlap there might be between these groups. For example, in this case it is quite likely that, with different groups of subjects, the mean for group 2 might be the same or even lower than the mean for group 1! In contrast, it is highly unlikely that, with different groups of subjects to those used here, there would be any overlap between group 3 and either of the other two groups.]

Group | Count | Mean | Standard Deviation |
Standard Error |
95 Pct Conf Int for Mean |

Grp 1 | 6 | 396.6667 | 84.0635 | 34.3188 | 308.4488 TO 484.8845 |

Grp 2 | 6 | 434.3333 | 85.9806 | 35.1014 | 344.1036 TO 524.5631 |

Grp 3 | 6 | 682.0000 | 42.3840 | 17.3032 | 637.5214 TO 726.4786 |

Total | 18 | 504.3333 | 147.4537 | 34.7552 | 431.0063 TO 577.6603 |

GROUP | MINIMUM | MAXIMUM |

Grp 1 | 300.0000 | 550.0000 |

Grp 2 | 340.0000 | 560.0000 |

Grp 3 | 620.0000 | 740.0000 |

TOTAL | 300.0000 | 740.0000 |

*[Here are the results of the post-hoc tests that we asked for - in this
case, we asked for Newman-Keuls tests.]*

- - - - - O N E W A Y - - - - -

Variable RT

By Variable AGE

Multiple Range Tests: Student-Newman-Keuls test with significance level .050

The difference between two means is significant if

MEAN(J)-MEAN(I) >= 52.0508 * RANGE * SQRT(1/N(I) + 1/N(J))

with the following value(s) for RANGE:

Step 2 3

RANGE 3.02 3.67

(*) Indicates significant differences which are shown in the lower triangle

[Here's the interesting bit: below is a little table. If there is an asterix in the table, it means that the two groups concerned are significantly different at the 0.05 significance level. Here, we can see that group 3 is significantly different from groups 1 and 2. Groups 1 and 2 are not significantly different from each other.]

Grp | Grp | Grp | ||

Mean AGE | 1 | 2 | 3 | |

396.6667 | Grp 1 | |||

434.3333 | Grp 2 | |||

682.0000 | Grp 3 | * | * |

[The following bit merely reinforces what the table says: SPSS presents the groups in sets: groups shown within a set are not significantly different from each other. As we have already worked out from the previous little table, groups 1 and 2 are not significantly different, and so hey are lumped together. Group 3 is different from the others, and thus is placed in a subset by itself.]

Homogeneous Subsets (highest and lowest means are not significantly different)

Subset 1

Group Grp 1 Grp 2

Mean 396.6667 434.3333

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Subset 2

Group Grp 3

Mean 682.0000

- - - - - -

To save the Output, click on "File" and then "Save SPSS Output".

The conclusions that would be drawn from this output:

** **What would we conclude from these results? The overall (or "omnibus")
ANOVA is significant, which tells us that there is *some* difference, somewhere,
between our three groups, in terms of reaction time. Inspection of the means
suggests that the "old" group are slower than the two younger groups, and that
there is little difference between the two younger groups. The Newman-Keuls
test confirms this impression statistically: the "old" subjects are indeed significantly
slower than the "young" and "middle-aged" subjects. The "middle-aged" subjects
are not significantly slower than the "young" subjects.

An Example Results Section

Table 1 displays the means and standard deviations of the RT scores (in milliseconds) for the different groups.

Table 1.

Group: |
Mean: |
Standard Deviation: |

Young |
397 |
84 |

Middle-aged |
434 |
86 |

Old |
682 |
42 |

Note: the use of meaningful group names and not numbers to label the groups.

Inspection of the histograms for each group revealed that the data were roughly normally distributed. The variances were also roughly equal in each group.

A one-way between-subjects (age(young vs middle-aged vs old)) ANOVA on RT scores was significant, F(2,15) = 26.61, p < .0001.

Note: the name of the independent variable (‘age’) is given in brackets, followed by the names of its levels in further brackets. The first number after the F is the degrees of freedom for treatment (i.e. between group variability) and the second number is the degrees of freedom for error (i.e. within group variability). Both of these are obtained from the analysis of variance summary table. F is given to two decimal places, and p would be given to two significant figures, e.g. p = .0016.

A Student Newman-Keuls indicated the following pattern:

__Young Middle-aged__ Old

Note: the convention used here is to write out the names of the groups __in
order of their means, __not necessarily in order of your code numbers 1,2,3.
You then underline those groups that were non-significantly different from each
other. For example, if you had one line underneath young and middle-aged, and
another underneath middle-aged and old, that would mean that the young differed
from the old, but there were no other significant differences. That is, you
would have to run more subjects to know whether the middle-aged are more like
the young or the old, or neither.

You need not use this visual convention if you think it is clearer to state the pattern in plain English; e.g. "A Student Newman-Keuls indicated that each group was significantly different from all others". Note also that the Student Newman-Keuls is only reported if the one-way ANOVA was significant.

This is all that appears in the results section. Raw data, histograms, and the ANOVA summary table should appear in the Appendix.